Democrats will Control the Senate if we win the White House
Post date: Mon, 02/01/2016 - 3:02pm
Democrats are well positioned in 2016 to retake the United States Senate. Unlike in 2014, a majority of the seats up for election are current Republican seats, many of which are in states that Obama carried in 2008 and 2012. Since this is a Presidential election year, turnout will be high. If Democrats flip 5 seats from Republican control, we will once again control the agenda in the Senate. This article lists the key seats up for grabs. Some are seats currently controlled by Democrats, and we must retain those. Others are open seats currently held by Republicans. And the rest are seats where incumbent Republicans are vulnerable to electoral defeat.
SEATS TO HOLD [NV & CO]
Nevada: This seat is technically a toss up, and we must retain it after Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid announced his retirement from the Senate. The likely nominees are Democrat Catherine Cortez Masto (Former Attorney General of Nevada) and Republican Rep. Joe Heck (NV-03). The Presidential primary campaigns in NV will be mindful of that state's Senate seat and hoping to flip it. We must continue to hold this seat.
Colorado: This seat is in danger as Democrats have suffered in Colorado in recent years. Incumbent Senator Michael Bennet has been struggling to obtain the re-election support needed, especially with the gun lobby heating up in the state. We must help reelect Senator Bennet.
SENATE SEATS WE CAN FLIP [WI, IL, OH]
Wisconsin [Priority]: Progressive uproar in recent years against Governor Scott Walker's anti-union agenda could facilitate taking back the Senate seat in this state. Popular former Democratic Senator Russ Feingold announced his bid late last year to take down the candidate that beat him during the red wave in 2010 -- incumbent junior Republican Senator Ron Johnson. All polling done so far in the state shows Feingold with a considerable lead over the incumbent senator. Feingold's popularity could take back this senate seat for Democrats.
Illinois [Priority]: War hero and progressive Democratic champion Rep. Tammy Duckworth (IL-08) last year declared her run to challenge incumbent junior Republican Senator Mark Kirk. Duckworth's impressive resume and brave service to her country could help her win back this important Senate seat that President Barack Obama once held, as a recent PPP poll shows her leading the sitting Senator.
Ohio [Priority]: Although incumbent Republican Senator Rob Portman remains in good standing with the GOP establishment despite his support for marriage equality, it is possible to convert this long-held Republican seat to Democratic hands with a strong Democrat at the top of the ticket this year. Currently, the two Democratic candidates running for the nomination are former Governor Ted Strickland and Cincinnati City Councilmember P.G. Sittenfeld. With Strickland’s strong name-ID, he has been narrowly leading Senator Portman in recent polling. Strickland also has a record of narrowly winning toss-up seats. He took back his former House seat after having lost it for one term during the 1994 Republican wave. However, he lost his gubernatorial re-election to Governor John Kasich, so this will be a tough battle in the November election.
TOSS UPS [FL, NH]
Florida: As Senator Marco Rubio tries to obtain the Republican nomination for President, his senate seat is open and currently a toss up. The top Democratic candidates are Rep. Alan Grayson (FL-09) and Rep. Patrick Murphy (FL-18). Rep. Alan Grayson has organized a progressive base fighting for more social security funding and one that is angry at the Republican establishment. Both Democratic contenders are polling well in matchups against possible Republican nominees in the state. The likely Republican nominees are Rep. Ron DeSantis (FL-06) and Rep. David Jolly (FL-13). We must take advantage of the progressive uproar in Florida and make this seat Democratic.
New Hampshire: Another state currently with a progressive uproar is New Hampshire. Incumbent Republican Senator Kelly Ayotte is struggling to make inroads with liberal-independent voters and tea-party voters, thus making her seat a toss up that looks good for Democrats. A Presidential election year is a great opportunity to make this seat blue again. The likely Democratic nominee is Governor Maggie Hassan and polling averages have suggested that she is well within the margin of error. We must make this toss up seat a priority in order to regain control of the Senate.
Possible But Not Likely: With Senator Rand Paul's sinking popularity and a light Democratic wave occurring in Kentucky, as well as Democratic Governor John Bel Edwards's resounding victory in the red state of Louisiana, both Kentucky and Louisiana are purple, and a strong field campaign will be important to turn the states more Democratic. In the pink state of Pennsylvania, Democrats shouldn't hold their breaths, but Pennsylvania voters are growing increasingly disappointed with their Republican representation in Washington. Openings for Democrats will come in this state in the next couple cycles, as well as in Texas as some analysts have predicted.
If the polling continues to go the way it is, the Senate could be evenly split (50-50) between the two parties come January 2017. The last time this happened was for the first three weeks of January 2001, between the outgoing Clinton Administration and incoming Bush Administration, when Vice President Al Gore gave the Democrats the tie-breaker and majority control in the Senate. We must win the presidency in 2016 in order to break any possible ties in that chamber and push the Democratic agenda forward in light of unprecedented Republican obstructionism. If Democrats reclaim both Ohio and New Hampshire, it will leave Democrats with a narrow majority (51-49) in the chamber.
HOW TO HELP
Visit the candidate websites provided and volunteer or donate to their campaigns. Or you can contribute to the Democratic Party, help make remote phone calls through the DNC, or visit the states of Nevada and Colorado to help turn out the vote.
SOURCES: Real Clear Politics polling averages, The Hill - Senate's Most Vulnerable 2016, 270towin.com, Wikipedia.
Submitted by: Shaian Mohammadi
The Status of the Gender Balance of Silicon Valley Elected Officials & Democratic Party Leadership
Post date: Mon, 06/22/2015 - 11:29pm
Silicon Valley is touted as being politically liberal or progressive. When issues of increasing minimum wage, sentence restructuring, medical marijuana, parental notification of abortions and same-sex marriage came before voters, almost always Silicon Valley voters have taken the more liberal position. Countless articles have been written that liberal Silicon Valley donors threaten G.O.P. campaigns and how Silicon Valley republicans remain “closeted” for their non-status quo and unpopular political and policy positions. Republican presidential nominees have lost every county in the Bay Area after the 1988 Presidential Election. But how does Silicon Valley contend in the gender lens of the equity of elected officials and democratic party leadership?
Women hold 42.2% of publicly elected offices in Santa Clara County with 202 women and 277 men total. Relatively speaking, Santa Clara County is doing fairly well; however, it certainly does not hold the title of “Feminist Capital of the Nation” it once did in the 1970s. The Santa Clara County Democratic Party gender balance of officers are almost offset with five out of 12 women officers (41.7%), but the democratic central committee voting members are at a low percentage of 26.4 being women. Just as cultural and ethnic diversity allows for distinct perspectives to be a part of the discussion, bringing women to the table of policy decisions fundamentally changes a conversation. While the topic of how women’s political participation shifts governance is important, this is a whole other matter that warrants an entirely new discussion. For an in-depth read, I would suggest Janet A. Flammang’s work Women’s Political Voice: How Women Are Transforming the Practice and Study of Politics.
Arguably, “the heart of Silicon Valley” consists of cities in both San Mateo County and Santa Clara County; although, for the purpose of this report, I have focused on Santa Clara County, specifically, the data from the Santa Clara County Registrar of Voters. In Santa Clara County, city and county government hold poor records for the number of women in office. Women make up 31.2% of the 93 city council seats from the 15 cities in the county. Of the county seats for district attorney, sheriff, assessor and the five board of supervisors, only two out of all eight seats are held by women.
Special districts’ gender ratio is at 28.8% women with 21 seats of the 73 seats held by women. Special districts in general are more obscure to the community at large. Each district decides how to handle advertising of the open seats within the district. Perhaps it is time for them to create a different approach in raising awareness of their respective districts and their civic roles.
The county democratic party hardly focuses on judicial races and judicial candidates seldom reach out to local clubs for endorsements; however, I have elected to include their ratio in this piece because courts have the ability to deeply impact anyone who is involved in the justice system, and people in a lower socio-economic class are likely to have less control over and support with their legal matters. Female judges make up 43% of the Santa Clara County Superior Court, which is not split evenly but the ratio is higher than I had anticipated. Perhaps it can be attributed to the steady increase of the number of women in law in the U.S. since the 1970s and the fact that the number of women in law has been cruising just under 50% for the past ten years.
To finish on a good note, women seem to be notably more engaged in education policy. I could speculate that the reason for this is because mothers are personally invested in their children’s education or they value education equity in general as it heightens career mobility. Whatever the cause is, K-12 boards are slightly above the 50% threshold of women in office.
Lastly, the Santa Clara County Democratic Party welcomes the idea of holding itself accountable so I have presented the status of women in the party leadership. Women hold five of the 12 party officer seats, but it has challenges in electing more female central committee delegates in nearly all Assembly Districts. Only the 24th Assembly District rests at 50% female central committee voting delegates. Overall, women central committee voting members make up 26.4%. Even within the party, we face many challenges with gender parity.
Last year, Santa Clara County Democratic Party (SCCDP) passed a resolution on Equal Representation in Elected Office and the SCCDP’s Commitment to Improving the Status of Women in Santa Clara County. Among other items, the resolution created a Director role to be dedicated to this effort, and the party committed itself to doubling the number of Democratic women in local elected and appointed office in Santa Clara County by the year 2020, the 100th anniversary of the 19th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution: Women’s Right to Vote. The Committee on Gender Equity and Status of Women was formed to achieve the party and director’s goals. The next piece to be published will list all of the upcoming open seats within Santa Clara County with details on office term lengths and limits. The Santa Clara County Office of Women’s Policy will be releasing data on the gender ratio of women on county boards and commissions. In partnership with the National Women’s Political Caucus of Silicon Valley (NWPC-SV), Silicon Valley Young Democrats (SVYD), Silicon Valley Latino Democratic Forum, Peninsula Democratic Coalition (PDC), Peninsula Young Democrats (PYD), and Silicon Valley Asian Pacific American Democratic Club (SVAPADC), the committee and Democratic Activists for Women Now (DAWN)hosted an event on March 18, 2015 on Advancing Women in Politics. Keep your eyes peeled for the next post, upcoming events and resources for women entertaining the idea of being more civically engaged.
Author’s note: This piece was prepared for the DAWN (Democratic Activists for Women Now) May newsletter and the Santa Clara County Democratic Party Committee on Gender Equity and Status of Women quarterly report. Research on local elected office was conducted by Hannah Holloway, Anna Ko, Umika Kumar. For a report on the gender balance of state and federal lawmakers see Gender Parity in the U.S. and California Legislature.
Submitted by: Anna Ko
People's Climate March: A Good Start
Post date: Wed, 10/01/2014 - 8:39pm
The pitiful coverage by the corporate media notwithstanding, Sunday September 21, 2014 was the day of the largest Climate Crisis demonstration in history. With almost 400,000 attending the very long, very humid march through the streets of downtown New York City, it was even bigger than the gathering in Washington DC in 1963, made famous by Martin Luther King's "I have a dream" speech. I was privileged to attend... and all of us have a dream too, of a planet whose human inhabitants regain their sense of connection with the earth and all other living things so we can all survive and thrive.
The adventure started a week earlier in Emeryville where 120 fellow activists -- off all ages, colors and proclivities -- held a short rally before boarding the People's Climate Train for a 4 day journey across the U.S., heading for New York City and picking up activists along the way. Our numbers grew by 50% by the time we got there. Each day there were more interesting people to share stories with, and many had areas of expertise to share. There were workshops on everything from organic farming and the chemistry of climate change to transportation alternatives, the future of clean energy, the divestment movement and other strategies to bring about change.
I gave a well-attended talk on how money in politics is the single biggest obstacle to legislation dealing with the climate crisis. That opened a few eyes and explained some of the "bruises" we've all been getting beating our heads against the walls of Congress in futile attempts to provoke needed action. Being on a train gave rise to the useful metaphor of parallel tracks, representing the need to work on fixing the money-in-politics problem along with whatever else anyone in the audience might rate as their #1 priority, for the simple reason that little if any progress will be made on whatever the latter might be until we deal with the former.
The night before the big march several of us went to an event featuring speakers like Bill McKibben (founder of 350.org), Lester Brown (famous author of many books on the environment), Mary Robinson (President of Ireland and long-time anti-poverty activist), and several others. All had inspiring and sobering things to say about the need for immediate action to stop the damage being done by the cabal of "rogue" fossil fuel companies hell-bent on short term profits, regardless of the costs to the planet and the rest of us.
One of the more radical suggestions which highlighted how serious the problem really is, was that President Obama treat these rogue companies like any other terrorist group threatening humanity and issue an executive order freezing all their assets. I'm not sure if the President could actually do that, or what worldwide economic ripples might emanate from such an action, but I must confess the idea has great appeal. That would certainly get a lot of people's attention and show both the leadership and seriousness of purpose that've been sorely lacking to this point. And just start to imagine all the positive things that could be set in motion with such a bold move: the redirection of assets into renewable energy development and deployment (FDR did something similar with the auto industry at the beginning of WWII), the subsidizing of whole new green industries and the jobs that would come with them, and aid that could be made available to those poor countries already being devastated by the climate change we here in the United States are primarily responsible for causing (China recently surpassed us in annual green house gas emissions, but the vast majority of all the global warming gases that have accumulated up there in the last 200 years came from the USA).
Whatever we do, we better do it fast and since the forces arrayed against humanity have most of the money, we're going to have to rely on our numbers to win back a viable future. That means each of us is going to have to be willing to be uncomfortable and inconvenienced, to move outside our comfort zones and take action when called upon. Nothing we hold dear is guaranteed...and democracy is not a spectator sport. "Let's roll."
Submitted by: Craig Dunkerley
Judy Pipkin Honored as Woman of the Year by State Senator Jim Beall
Post date: Mon, 02/24/2014 - 7:06am
If you’re a Democratic Party activist in Santa Clara County, you know Judy Pipkin. If you’ve ever visited Democratic Party headquarters here, you know Judy Pipkin. If you’ve needed volunteers to register voters, walk precincts, or help at an event, you know Judy Pipkin. Our own Judy Pipkin, heart and soul of the SCCDP headquarters office, was honored as Woman of the Year at a ceremony held in State Senator Jim Beall’s Campbell office on February 21st.
Well-wishers packed the Senator’s office, a testament to the impact Judy has had. Never one to crave the spotlight, Judy stood quietly next to Sen. Beall as he praised her as “a person of the community” and passionate advocate for social justice. “Judy runs the Democratic Party office with a heart. A big heart – that’s what her whole life’s about,” he said.
A mother of six, Judy has worked a variety of careers over the years, from retail to nursing to mentoring foster kids. But there was always one thing in common: “Since I was young, I always wanted to feel that I am contributing something to the world,” says Judy. “I want to help give back what people have given to me.”
Steve Preminger, SCCDP County Chair, commented, “Judy is the anchor for the Santa Clara County Democratic Party. She is the one who selflessly staffs the headquarters day after day taking calls from the public, usually intense calls, as well as from Democrats who want to get involved and don’t know how. She does this with efficiency, empathy and humor, and as a result has built a cadre of volunteers who keep us as the center of Democratic life in the county.” He added, “We all join Senator Beall in saluting this great woman, who, by the way, would rather be doing ANYTHING other than being acknowledged for her contributions.”
Submitted by: rachel
Help Typhoon Haiyan Survivors in the Philippines
Post date: Mon, 11/18/2013 - 12:34pm
The Santa Clara County Democratic Party is sponsoring a relief effort to help those suffering the devastating effects of the recent Typhoon Haiyan in the Philippines. Survivors are in dire need of our support as the country tries to recover. As is usually the case, the best way to help is a donation to one of the many organizations with the training and resources to get aid quickly and effectively to those who most urgently need it.
WHERE: The SCCDP will collect your checks, along with other donations, at our Party Headquarters, 2901 Moorpark Avenue, Suite 110, in San Jose.
WHEN: Drop-off times are 10 am to 3 pm daily, as well as from 10 to 4 this Saturday, November 23rd. Our last day of collecting non-monetary donations is Wednesday, November 27th.
WHAT: Checks to the organization of your choice are preferred, but we are also collecting cargo boxes, clothing, toiletries, and unperishable food items.
The organizations listed below are all providing aid to those affected by Typhoon Haiyan:
Submitted by: rachel
I’m Covered, California!!
Post date: Sun, 10/13/2013 - 4:50pm
Written by Jordan Eldridge
On October 1, 2013 the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act’s California health exchange, Covered California, went live. Obamacare has officially moved beyond a political talking point and has now officially become a part of our everyday lives. Personally, I couldn’t be any more excited! It eluded past presidents and Congress for nearly 100 years, but President Obama finally achieved what seemed impossible: affordable access to healthcare. While many can agree that the ACA is not ideal, it has drastically moved the goal posts toward a universal health care system that is long overdue in this country.
I signed up for health care insurance through Covered California on October 8th. I am excited about this opportunity because I have been without health care insurance for four out of the past five years. During this time I have had to deal with major health problems associated with my body rejecting mesh from repeated hernia surgeries dating from 2007. I currently have $20,000 in health care debt because I have not had insurance. Covered California will not help me out of debt; however I am finally relieved to be able to participate in California’s health exchange and obtain great health insurance at an affordable rate for my future health needs.
Based upon my income, I was able to sign up for the Anthem Blue Cross, Silver 70 PPO plan. With a low-income subsidy drastically reducing my $250 premium, I am going to be paying $41.73 a month with zero deductible and $3 co-pay. Wow! Now that is affordable! While this premium price will vary depending on your income level, I have found that this new program is indeed geared towards the middle class.
I was pleased with my experience. I highly recommend that everyone who does not have health insurance through their employer sign up for Covered California and see what savings you can get. It has certainly given me a new perspective!
Director, Rancho Rinconada Recreation and Park District Board of Directors
28th Assembly District Delegate, California Democratic State Central Committee
Submitted by: rachel
The Republican Assault on America
Post date: Wed, 10/02/2013 - 4:31pm
Well, they've really done it: After 41 attempts at repeal, Republicans have finally made good on their promise to shut down government rather than let uninsured Americans have affordable access to health care. Just how unconscionable is this move? Let's look at who is affected:
And that's just the tip of the iceberg. This stunt by a party that fancies itself a bastion of fiscal rectitude will cost the country $300 million a day. It's not just disappointed visitors to national parks and the National Zoo's Panda Cam that are impacted. This shutdown means real pain to real people -- in some cases it could mean literally a life or death decision. And why? Let's repeat: to prevent people from having access to affordable health care.
Don't ever let anyone tell you that there is no difference between our two political parties.
Submitted by: rachel
Don’t Wait – Make a Difference in Your Community TODAY!
Post date: Mon, 09/23/2013 - 3:54pm
Active Democrats want to make their neighborhoods, their communities – their world – a better place. Luckily, there are plenty of ways to get involved and be the change YOU want to see.
Know your District and Your Representatives
You can be a more effective advocate for your community when you know your district and your local representatives. Find them at the Santa Clara County Registrar of Voters, here.
Board and Commissions
Be a leader in your community by joining a board or commission. Check for vacancies here.
Work for a cause you believe in. Join hands with others in advocating on behalf of important issues that affect us all.
BAYMEC (LGBT community)
CA DISCLOSE (campaign finance reform)
Ready to throw your hat into the ring? These organizations provide training for candidates:
Be the most effective advocate you can be. Hone your leadership skills with training programs from these organizations:
Have something to add? Please send resource suggestions to Rachel Sumi at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Have an event you would like to share? Add it to our calendar!
Submitted by: rachel
SCCDP Supports Responsible Fair Trade
Post date: Fri, 09/20/2013 - 2:08pm
This month, the Santa Clara County Democratic Party passed a resolution opposing the Trans-Pacific Partnership TPP); the California Democratic Party recently passed a similar resolution. Local representatives Mike Honda and Zoe Lofgren have joined the opposition and are urging their colleagues to oppose the TPP and the Fast-Track negotiation process. Congress may vote on the TPP as early as October 1st this year.
The precedent set by NAFTA and other more recent trade agreements illustrate the problem of hastily sacrificing our domestic sovereignty to the tribunals set up by so-called “free trade” institutions like the World Trade Organization. Under NAFTA, for example, important health and safety safeguards have been sacrificed, while multi-national corporations enjoy the benefits of a race to the bottom in terms of wages and worker protection. The supposed economic benefits are also a sham: Under the last three free trade agreements (with Korea, Colombia and Panama), combined U.S. exports to these countries actually fell by four percent. Our bilateral trade deficit with South Korea actually increased by 30 percent its first year. And jobs? These free trade agreements have proven as adept at creating new jobs as massive tax cuts were at sparking the economy. Just look at the latest unemployment figures to see how that’s worked out.
Even worse, Wall Street has pushed for financial services agreements within TPP that limit necessary regulation like firewalls between different types of banking, protections against “too big to fail,” and banning risky financial products – the same type of banking practices that blew up the world economy in 2008 and whose fallout we still suffer today. The Electronic Frontier Foundation has slammed the TPP for extending restrictive intellectual property laws across the globe and for its lack of transparency.
Indeed, TPP’s lack of transparency is a huge concern, especially under a “Fast Track” negotiation process. Fast Track allows the executive branch to complete negotiations in secret, sign the pact, and present it to Congress as is, with no avenue for meaningful public input or debate.
What would be better than a Fast-Tracked TPP? A new trade agreement negotiation and approval process that restores a robust role for Congress, secures prosperity for the greatest number of Americans, and preserves the vital tenets of American democracy in the era of globalization.
Here’s a great place to start if you’d like to learn more about TPP and what it means for our country – and our democracy.
Submitted by: rachel
It’s finally here: Obamacare ready to launch
Post date: Thu, 09/12/2013 - 10:08am
October 1st marks a date many of us have been dreaming about – it’s the moment when consumers will be able to shop for health insurance on the long-awaited exchange made available by the Affordable Care Act. Consumers will be able to compare their health insurance options and select the choice that works best for them and their families. Small business owners will also have options for their employees. Subsidies will be available for those who qualify, bringing our country closer to the goal of affordable, accessible health care for every citizen. After all, no one should face financial ruin because of an illness or accident.
Of course, don’t tell that to Republicans in Congress, who have voted to block the Affordable Care Act no fewer than 40 times, as well as taking steps to sabotage its implementation. Expanding Medicaid, a critical part of covering millions of uninsured patients, has also been thwarted by Republican governors and/or legislatures in 22 states, which means that individuals who might have qualified for Medicaid under an expanded program will now be denied not only Medicaid but their eligibility to qualify for subsidized private insurance through the federal health care exchanges.
Such mean-spiritedness will likely backfire. Unfortunately for Republicans, Obamacare is working, and it’s popular. We already know that the growth in healthcare costs has slowed since Obamacare was adopted. And early analyses of the health insurance exchanges show that the cost of coverage for most consumers will be lower than originally anticipated. While the GOP continues its relentless fear-mongering over the ACA, its individual elements – keeping young adults on their parents’ plan, preventing the denial of coverage for pre-existing conditions, etc. – are extremely popular. A large majority (57%) opposes the GOP’s attempts to cut off funding for Obamacare.
Fortunately, California has been at the forefront of making the ACA a reality for its citizens, and those of us in Santa Clara County are smart enough to have elected members of Congress who are committed to accessible health care for all. Reps. Anna Eshoo, Zoe Lofgren, and Mike Honda all have information on their websites for those interested in learning more about Covered California, the health exchange program set up in our state. In fact, Mike Honda recently held a town hall meeting for those in his district who needed answers, an event he has repeated several times over the years. State Senator Jim Beall has two health care forums scheduled for October 5th and October 19th for those who want to learn more.
Affordable health care for all – it’s a dream that’s finally coming true, a dream made possible by Democrats.
Submitted by: rachel